Structural Repair Insights

Structural Aircraft On Ground Repair: Faster, Compliant Return to Service.

AOG structural repair, step-by-step. Operator actions, field controls, and audit-ready RTS under FAA/EASA Part 145.

AOG structural repair, step-by-step. Operator actions, field controls, and audit-ready RTS under FAA/EASA Part 145.

What is structural aircraft on-ground (AOG) repair?

Structural Aircraft On Ground (AOG) repair is a controlled, field-executed maintenance process performed under approved data—typically defined by the Structural Repair Manual (SRM), OEM engineering, or DER-approved solutions—to restore airworthiness without repositioning the aircraft, while maintaining full Part 145 compliance and traceability.

What Is a Structural Repair Manual (SRM)?

A Structural Repair Manual (SRM) is an OEM-issued technical document that defines approved repair methods, damage limits, and allowable procedures to restore aircraft structural integrity while maintaining airworthiness.

The SRM specifies:

  • Acceptable damage limits (cracks, dents, corrosion, delamination)
  • Approved repair schemes (doublers, patches, bonded repairs)
  • Materials, fasteners, and processes
  • Inspection and verification requirements

For operators and MRO teams, the SRM is the primary source of approved data used to determine whether damage can be repaired and how that repair must be executed.

If damage falls within SRM limits, repair can proceed using predefined methods.


If it falls outside SRM limits, alternative approval paths—such as OEM engineering or DER—are required.

SRM vs OEM vs DER — Decision Logic

Structural repair follows a clear hierarchy of approved data:

  1. SRM → First reference for standard repairs
  2. OEM engineering → When damage exceeds SRM limits
  3. DER approval → When OEM data is not available within required timelines

This decision pathway directly affects:

  • Compliance
  • Turnaround time (TAT)
  • Operational impact

Why AOG happens (season by season)

Aircraft on Ground (AOG) events spike for different reasons across the year.

In spring, migrating wildlife increases bird-strike risk, often requiring inspection and structural repair before dispatch.

In summer, thunderstorms introduce hail, lightning, turbulence, and icing exposure—affecting radomes, nacelle inlets, and leading edges.

In winter, de-icing operations and contamination increase inspection findings that delay return to service.

Year-round, ground support equipment (GSE) contact remains a major driver of structural damage.

For a deeper understanding of how structural damage is identified before repair decisions, see:  What Is Aircraft Structural Damage: Causes, Types, and How It Is Inspected

This playbook shows how operators and mobile structural teams work as one: what to do before arrival, how to control field variables, and which compliance guardrails ensure a defensible Return-to-Service (RTS).

Before the Team Arrives: Operator Actions That Save Hours

Stabilize and document (immediately)

  • Isolate the area to prevent contamination or further damage
  • Protect from moisture or environmental exposure if required
  • Take wide and close photos with measurement reference
  • Document deformation direction if visible

Assemble one decision packet

  • Part number (PN) and serial number (SN)
  • Exact damage location and dimensions
  • Recent maintenance history
  • Preliminary NDT (if performed)

Include operational constraints:

  • GSE availability
  • Power access
  • Shelter
  • Curfews

Define time window and access path

  • Confirm AOG priority level
  • Assess operational impact
  • Share airport access, customs, and escalation contacts

What Changes in the Field (and How It Is Controlled)

Environment is the first variable

Composite repairs require:

  • Controlled heat
  • Verified vacuum
  • Cure logs tied to repair traveler

Metallic repairs require:

  • Torque documentation
  • Corrosion protection records

These are mandatory elements of Part 145 traceability.

See how traceability supports compliant release: Structural Repair Traceability in Part 145 Repair Stations

Access is the second variable

Field teams adapt:

  • Fixturing
  • Scaffolding
  • Safety buffers

Without altering the approved repair scheme.

If facility-dependent steps (e.g., autoclave) are required, a split workflow must be planned.

Inspection closes the loop

NDT selection is damage-driven:

  • UT → bond integrity
  • Eddy current → metallic structures
  • PT / MT → surface defects

Performed under recognized standards (e.g., EN4179 / NAS410).

Structural Scenarios: When On-Site Beats Ferry

The decision is not “can we repair it?” but:

“Can we repair it faster, safely, and compliantly on-site vs repositioning?”

Fuselage and wing skin

Typical damage:

  • Punctures
  • Dents
  • Minor buckling

Why on-site works:

  • SRM-supported repairs
  • Standard tooling
  • No repositioning risk

Nacelles and radomes

Typical damage:

  • Hail
  • Erosion
  • Composite defects

Why on-site works:

  • Portable composite repair capability
  • Reduced handling risk
  • Faster TAT

Flight control surfaces

Typical damage:

  • Skin damage
  • Trailing edge defects

Why on-site works:

  • Combined repair + balance validation
  • Immediate coordination

Ferry or Field? A Decision Framework

Choose on-site when:

  • SRM or approved data supports repair
  • TAT pressure is high
  • Environment can be controlled

Choose repositioning when:

  • Access is unsafe
  • Facility equipment is required
  • Data constraints require OEM

Always document:

  • Measurements
  • Photos
  • Risk assessment
  • Schedule impact

This becomes part of the audit trail.

Compliance Guardrails

Data first

SRM / OEM / DER approval must exist before work begins

To understand how SRM fits within repair classification: What Is Aircraft Structural Repair? A Guide to Major vs. Minor Alterations (and Repairs)

Qualified personnel

  • Certification records
  • NDT qualifications
  • Authorization tracking

As-run proof

  • Cure logs
  • Heat/vacuum records
  • Torque sheets
  • NDT reports

Work away from base

Must comply with:

  • FAA “work away from station”
  • EASA 145.A.75(c)

Release discipline

Return-to-service via:

  • FAA 8130-3
  • EASA Form 1

On-Site Workflow (Condensed)

Mobilize → Scope → Execute → Validate → Release

KPIs Operators Should Track

  • Time to site
  • Time to scope
  • Touch vs wait time
  • Documentation completeness
  • RTS variance

Key insight:


Reducing non-productive time (logistics, access, environment) has greater impact than reducing repair execution time.

What You Receive (and Why It Matters)

  • Repair traveler (linked to approved data)
  • As-run evidence (logs, NDT, torque)
  • Material traceability (COC, batch, shelf life)
  • Photo documentation
  • RTS certification

Output of a compliant AOG repair:

A complete, traceable documentation package that proves the repair meets engineering, regulatory, and airworthiness requirements at the moment of return-to-service.

AOG Repair Within the MRO Ecosystem

Structural AOG repair operates within a broader MRO system that integrates:

  • Engineering approval pathways
  • Execution capability
  • Logistics coordination
  • Compliance and documentation

See how this is structured at service level: MRO Services

For how execution, logistics, and engineering are coordinated at scale:  Repair Management

When damage exceeds standard limits, compliant alternatives are enabled through:  DER Repairs

FAQs

What is the purpose of a Structural Repair Manual (SRM)?

The SRM defines approved repair methods and damage limits established by the aircraft manufacturer to restore structural integrity while maintaining airworthiness.

Can all structural damage be repaired using the SRM?

No. If damage exceeds SRM limits, repair requires OEM engineering or DER-approved data.

Plan Ahead, Land Sooner

Structural AOG events are inevitable.
Delays are not.

Pre-stage:

  • Contact protocols
  • Access procedures
  • Tooling kits
  • Documentation templates

A structured AOG repair program turns disruption into controlled execution—delivering compliant, airworthy, and predictable return-to-service.

Rethink Repairs. Reclaim Your Budget.

Explore how MRO services and DER Repairs from DAS can reduce costs, speed up turnaround, and extend component life—without compromising safety or compliance.

Contact Us
No items found.